Uncyclopedia:VFH/The word parakeet written exactly two hundred and forty-two times

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:VFH
Revision as of 17:21, August 9, 2007 by Spang (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


The word parakeet written exactly two hundred and forty-two times (history, logs)

Article: The word parakeet written exactly two hundred and forty-two times

Score: -5 parakeets short of 242

Nominated by: Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
For: 9
  1. Parakeet, parakeet parakeet parakeet, parakeet. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  2. parakeet P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  3. parakeet -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  4. parakeet! --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) Mchammer 03:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  5. ...with PARAKEET!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 07:50 Dec 18, 2014 03:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  6. parakeet     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      03:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  7. parakeet although the original was better... but this is better than nothing. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 03:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  8. parakeet - parakeet parakeet. --Sir Starnestommy Icons-flag-us (TalkContribsCUNCapt.) 03:55, August 9, 2007 03:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  9. parakeet --Dexter111344 05:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Against: 14
  1. Against. It's funny, but not feature-worthy. --Algorithm 03:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  2. Strong against: the effort (or lack of it) put into this is the first thing that's unappealing. Writers put a lot of time and effort into creating satirical brilliance (something that this is not), and this is to me an insult to everything I've ever written were it to be put on the front page. Punctuation is nonexistent, and an appropriate flow is missing, something that most other pages with repetition have (making them less painful to read). --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 04:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  3. Feels like an AAAAAAAA! clon, or at least a spin off. Don't tell me you didn't think of AAAAAAAA! the moment you saw it.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 04:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
    I didn't think of AAAAAAAA! the moment I saw it. --Sir Starnestommy Icons-flag-us (TalkContribsCUNCapt.) 04:36, August 9, 2007
  4. The original was funny because it was what the title claimed, and the filled-out one (with the edit buttons and categories parakeet'd) was as well. The version as of now is a mixture of both and includes non-parakeet words. I don't find it very funny. Either one of the previous versions would have my vote, however. vyvyan 04:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  5. Walrus What does it say about Uncyclopedia that the for-against ratio in VFH is currently precisely the same as it was for this article on VFD? Sir Roger 05:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  6. Against - Many people have said this before, but it isn't 2005 anymore. The jokeish nature of featuring articles like this has completely worn off. The fact that this has more for votes than many great articles that have missed out on VFH is quite pathetic really. Honestly, I think people should be taking VFH more seriously. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  7. Big fat ugly uber against As per Cs -RAHB 06:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  8. Against. Been done before -Bretthead 06:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  9. No. --THINKER 06:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  10. Against. Oh man, it's amusing in its way, but it is not a highlight worthy article. It's too much of a one-hit joke. Most highlights (at least that I've seen) have more than one string to their comedic bow. --Under user 09:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  11. Against. Meh.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 12:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  12. Here in my comment is the word Against one time. --~ Tophatsig 15:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  13. Against. 2005 called. It wants its "Hey! Let's feature this one-note, amusing for about a second, gimmick page! Wooo!" back. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  14. Against. If An article that contains nothing but a full stop can't be featured, I don't see why this should be Randomator 16:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  15. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. . : :: . ::. --Mr.Vib 17:09, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Abstain until we decide on which version. Its been changed and reverted multiple times today alone, and for me its important to know which version I'm voting on. See my comments on it's talk page. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:58, 09 August 2007
I think that part of the humor comes from the fact that it is constantly being reverted and edited. And it's not multiple reverts today, it's multiple reverts in the past hour.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      04:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
The original is way better. Aything else and it becomes an AAA clone wih parakeet instead. And the addition of words that aren't parakeet is baaad. Spang talk 04:21, 09 Aug 2007

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools
projects