Uncyclopedia:VFH/The O'Reilly Factor, Tuesday May 13, 1865

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The O'Reilly Factor, Tuesday May 13, 1865 (history, logs)

Article: The O'Reilly Factor, Tuesday May 13, 1865

Score: 11.5 Telenewspapervision shows

Nominated by: Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 12:31 September 10 '09
For: 14.5
  1. Nom and for. Modus is fucking great! Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 12:31 September 10 '09
  2. For. Take that, baby killers! Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:52, 10 September 2009
  3. For. I liked it. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 21:45, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
  4. For. Even though Abraham Lincoln would be rolling in his grave. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:16, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
  5. Insufferability! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:53, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
  6. Indubitably! Necropaxx (T) {~} 05:44, Sep 11
  7. Meh. Whatever. Either way is good. I didn't read it or anything. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN16:13, 11 Sep
  8. For. Funny and well written - I thought the idea of incorporating the 19th century style advertisements was very clever. LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 08:10, September 12, 2009 (UTC)
  9. For. Most acceptable. ChiefjusticeDS 09:14, September 18, 2009 (UTC)
  10. Perspicacity! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 05:05, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
  11. For. Haberdashery! --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:32, Sep 22
  12. Dig --THINKER 07:28, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
  13. For. Perfect mix of nostalgia and O'Reilly-ness. 15:09, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
  14. For. History be damned--DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  19:59, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
  15. God Yes --I'mthedaddy 22:32, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 3
  1. Against. This article isn't quite sure what it wants to be, I feel. -- educated Ape (affiliate) (Riot Porn) 13:55, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. The author seems to be unaware that back in the 19th Century, the Republicans were the party of Big government. high taxes,Damn Yankees, and negroes. Mn-z 14:09, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Against; it's funny, but I can't help but feel that Bill's moustache is not big enough and rather French looking. I also can't help but feel that Bill O'Reilly will probably do a segment on Uncyclopedia's liberalism. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 23:07, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
    Wait, you're voting against because Bill's stache is too French? My, we are picky. Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:49, Sep 23

Comment Mnbvxz: I am aware of that. I tried it flipped around, but it went from a little muddy straight to confusing. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:53, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

Comment. Were they really both nudists? I knew I should have voted for them. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 04:26, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
Somebody changed their comment while I was responding. :P DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 04:28, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
That was me (I'd previously pointed out that both Lincoln, a Republican, and the VP who succeeded him, a Democrat, were nudists. I'm glad we could clear that up). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:31, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
I think it would make more sense having O'Reilly as a Democrat and Obama as a Republican. Well, atleast to those who have some familiarity with 19th century politics. --Mn-z 04:41, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
This is Uncyclopedia. We don't let actual history get in the way of a good story. Go along with the conceit. You know you want to. Or don't. Either way, I'm not letting you date my sister. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:00, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
  • I sent an email to O'Reilly about this. Let's see what he does (if those bastards even check the email). MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 00:21, September 12, 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. His mustache gets bigger in each successive picture! Necropaxx (T) {~} 04:39, Sep 14
  • Abstain. Dunno what to make of it. Sir ACROLO KUNFPWAOTMFA •(SPAM) 06:56, September 24, 2009 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools