Uncyclopedia:VFH/Stephen Colbert

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Stephen Colbert (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Stephen Colbert	Score: 11 Americans, AND SO CAN YOU!
Nominated by:	Æ 00:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
For: 20	NF - a high qwality rewrite from our next WotY--Æ 00:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC) For. It's quite simply a well written and very clever article from an extremely talented writer. The mention of Stangers with Candy was enough to make me smile. I'd definatly love to see an article on Timothy Stack (of Night Stand with Dick Dietrick fame) in the near future. MadMax 01:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Dig me parodying me is always fun. If this vitriol does get FA'd, all I ask is that the second pic be the image, since it makes more sense in context. --THINKER 04:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC) For Please feature this. Not only is it funny, and original, but it's a page full of truth that needs to be exposed. Now I for one am not a huge advocate of truth on Uncyclopedia, but I'll make an exception for this funny-because-it's-true (and also sad-because-it's-funny-because-it's-true) article. -RAHB 04:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC) STRONG AGAINST, STEPHEN WILL KILL YOU ALL! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:38, Jan 26 Awesome! Just feature it already! -->:( 05:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Strong For--Dr. Fenwick 06:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Oi polloi --Vana 21:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC) For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 23:42, Jan. 26, 2008 For I miss Sw/C (Yet I lap up the Report like a dog regardless...) --monika 00:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Great - UnIdiot | Talk? | Theme - 02:50, Jan 27 Pleasantly surprised. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 02:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC) american fun  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 02:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC) For-- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 05:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC) And so can I! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC) For. I have spent a long time thinking about this one. A long, long time. Far too long for anyone to spend thinking about, of all things, an Uncyclopedia article. But I was divided. You see, – Long commentary censored: see Thinker's talk page for full version. – Anyway, I read it three times and am finally convinced that making fun of comedic snootiness overrides making fun of one of my favorite TV shows. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 02:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC) For I liked it. --Dexter111344 00:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC) F♥r. Once I got what it was about, I laughed. Probably the best anyone is going to do with this article. Well written. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 01:42 4 Feb, 2008) Weak Yes Read it again, it sort of... grew on me. Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
Against: 9	What, no mention of the Wikipedia vandalism!?! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 02:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Against. First person who calls me "unpatriotic" or anything like it gets banned. ;) —Hinoa talk.kun 05:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Against. Nah. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 06:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Against - Due to lack of satelite tv, I'm pretty much nuetral in the Colbert department. Judging by the article itself, it's really not an article, but a rant. Mainly, I don't like how it calls the reader (i.e. me) things like "idiot" and "fuckhead". -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 10:00, Jan. 29, 2008 Against I may be missing the point of this article, but it incited my anger more than it did my amusement.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 17:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Against --Moneke 10:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC) Possibly if Mr Colbert was as big outside of the US as he is in it this would be such a part of my culture that I would catch all the subtle references that are no doubt embedded within the article. Without them, and I'm guessing you do need them to "get" this, it just seems like a long rant. Maybe that's the point? Against...sorry... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Weak Against Stephen Colbert is funnier than this article. Also, a vote for feels like a vote against Colbert. Can't do that. Sean.hoyland - tak() 10:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC) Meh. The C-man himself could do way better. Parsat, or, A Whole Bunch of Mischief 01:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments	I guess you need to know who he is. mAttlobster. (hello) 01:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Abs. There was a pleasant whoosh sound as this went over my head, but that's about it. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 19:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC) You don't know Stephen Colbert? He is America, you know. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:54, Jan 28 That wasn't Colbert, that was the Poo Lit deadline going by. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 02:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH