For. eh, I wrote it. And hell am I never going near a place article again. Nikau 10:02, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
For. Whoa! I sped-read lots of it, and will come back to it, but am very impressed with the level of satire in this, as Puppy said, "gem". Aleister 11:59 12-1-'12
Comment. This article could probably have a smoother flow to it and consistency to the narrative, which I don't think would take too much editing to do. I'd happily vote for if it did...as its funny and well conceptualised ShabiDOO 04:11, January 13, 2012 (UTC)
I would give it greater flow, but the wikia fuck up on the mobile site doesn't allow me to edit anything except where it has a link like this vote thing. So can you wait - please - until they fix this mobile skin. --Nikau 14:27, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
Abstain. I have read this a few times, adding some minor changes but can't vote in favour. Perhaps I find the tone a bit too bitter for my own tastes. Sorry but it is still a good article. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:09, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
Featured. Hoo boy BlackFlamingo 23:29, February 25, 2012 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 25 February 2012. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.