Self-nom and for. I wrote this on a whim yesterday, having read the last attempt at writing an article on this topic. I am actually genuinely pleased with how it turned out and thought I'd give it a whirl on here. If there are problems with it then I'd love to hear about them, please bear this in mind if voting against. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:57, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
For. Short, but I like it. --Snippy 08:36, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
For. This will attract new 4chan users to our dwindling userbase! Also, I hate faces, so I'm also voting on those grounds. It'sMrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 03:40, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
Against. Is this a parody of something I don't get? —The preceding unsigned comment was added byRei (talk • contribs) 19:46, September 20, 2012
No, it's about the PC game Slender, which you can read about here. If there are any issues with the article I can change then please drop me a message here. --ChiefjusticePSX 15:48, September 20, 2012 (UTC)
Against. Certainly more intelligent than typical internet/video game articles, and for that it's very nice. It still doesn't rise beyond the "this game is bad and that makes it funny" concept for me. Sorry. -RAHB 23:39, September 25, 2012 (UTC)
Featured. It's a slender time for some but not for this article RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:03, October 10, 2012 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 10 October 2012. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.