Uncyclopedia:VFH/Simeon I

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Simeon I (history, logs)

Article: Simeon I

Score: 19 assholes

Nominated by: Great article.--Zico234 08:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
For: 20
  1. For--Zico234 08:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  2. Self-for I'm such a dirty whore. --General Insineratehymn 22:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  3. For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  4. For Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  5. Weak For It's funny clever and well written but it's wayyyyyyyyyy tooooooooo long! I found myself taking breaks during the article to facebook my friends. Still good.--Dr. Fenwick 00:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  6. Weak For as per Fenwick. It's been a while since our last bit from Uncyclopedia's Official Historian, but as Fenwick said, it's very long and the formatting is far from inviting, especially given the lengths. Break up those paragraphs! --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  7. For. I read through it in one sitting, you inattentive nincapoops. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 03:17, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  8. For     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   05:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)  
  9. For. Works much better now with some spacing between blocks of text. RabbiTechno 17:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  10. Strong for Not at all random. Brilliantly done, if a little lengthy.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  11. I ♥ Slavs and a Strong For. The contrast between subject matter and tone is immaculate, and the references are witty and found in just the right amount. There are even jokes at the expense of its own length, which if you ask me, makes up for it. We need more articles like this. User:Wehpudicabok/sig2 23:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  12. What the hell, why not? Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer (missile ponies for everyone!) 23:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  13. Good and edumactional. What's not to love. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  14. Syd Barret Yeah, I've always liked this one too. And by "always" I mean "in the four seconds since I just finished reading it." --THE 01:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  15. 4 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:38, Oct 25
  16. For. Well written, and a strong article. Glad I (finally) got round to reading it all! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:41, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  17. For. I always approve of comedy-history Zarbag 21:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  18. Weak For Didn't read the whole thing because I saw something shiny. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 17:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
  19. This is epic. --Algorithm 20:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  20. For. Spang talk 00:58, 17 Nov 2007
Against: 1
  1. I like it, but I'm not entirely certain it's featurable. Perhaps it'd benefit if the larger bits of text were broken up a bit? RabbiTechno 09:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  2. Kinda random. --Tampa 22:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  • You complain it's too long. What do you wish me to do? keep breaking apart the paragraphs until they're only two sentences in length? If you do, that's exactly what I'm doing right now. --General Insineratehymn 05:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Basically, I don't have a problem with big chunks of text because I read books (remember those?) but you know how the soundbite generation are - if they think something'll take more than three seconds to read, they lose interest and wander off with a glazed expression. RabbiTechno 11:35, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Just changed my vote as per all that^. RabbiTechno 17:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Abstain Good, but not that good. Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Meh Funny but TOOOOOO long --Moneke 07:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools