Uncyclopedia:VFH/Segue: a monologue

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Segue: a monologue (history, logs)

Article: Segue: a monologue

Score: 8 snoozing authors saved by a watermelon. No! Don't get too close; it's seedless.

Nominated by: Sycamore (Talk) 13:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
For: 11
  1. Symbol for vote Nom + For - Very tidy article, funny and quality stuff throughout.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  2. Have you seen my... For vote? Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:29, Nov 6
  3. For, obviously. It's one of those obsessive/in-character pages that still "works" months after I forgot what started it in the first place. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  4. For, hey I laughed despite its attempt to make me crazy.--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 15:34, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
  5. For...watermelons in Nam! --Vana 01:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
  6. For. I seem to remember judgifying something to do with this. I seem to remember thinking it was good. I still do. Yay for consistency! --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:07, Nov 16
  7. For. I always liked this one. I always liked you, too. No, not you. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 20:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
  8. Symbol for vote For. Sir Starnestommy Icons-flag-us (TalkContribsCUN) 16:18, Nov. 23, 2008
  9. Symbol for vote For. I especially like how unusual it is, uncyc needs more weirdness! User:Fag/sig5 21:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
  10. Symbol for vote For.-- Wait, have you seen my... comment? Ah here it is. Perfect-you can't get any better than a recurcive monologe, like this comment. Speaking of comments, did you see my comment? User:Citation Needed/sig 08:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
  11. for. have you seen my...Gerrycheevers? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Against: 3
  1. Against. I loved the last paragraph - there's definitely a feature hiding somewhere in there. But the other 80% of the article was just kind of meh to me. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 18:17, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
  2. Against. I don't get it...and I don't want to? IronLung 04:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
  3. Argh!!!. So many >s and <s!!! I can't be dealing with this! I just can't!!! McMajik - stealing yer face 'till the cows come home. 20:05, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Abstain- I just didn't get it. Then again, I do have a rather "silly" sense of humor.--Mnbvcxz 22:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote Stibby 'stain. Help me out here, I just don't really...like it. It's good, but it's not...that good. I dunno, I'm at a loss here. I love in-character articles (hell, most of my articles are in-character) but this one was just a little lacking for me. I can see how it's good, and yet I just didn't fall in love with it. sirErr.gifsysrq @ 15:49 Nov 26


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools