Self-Nom & For. This has been on Pee Review for a week, and I'm looking for some sort of input. If this gets featured, well then awesome. If not, I'd like to know why, and hopefully improve it. So yeah. Vote away. —SirGuildensternenstein 05:13, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
For. I feel bad because I like this article. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 10:58, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Weak For. I like the writing a lot, but it's so short! I think there's room for more funnehs. •••Necropaxx(T){~}16:35, May 8
For. I'm going up to Canada to watch this next year JackOfSpades (talk) 17:32, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
For. One of the best I've seen here so far. StyleGuide 18:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
For. Bonus points for "cuteness". IronLung 20:41, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Featured. ~ 07:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 11 May 2009. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.