Uncyclopedia:VFH/Sarah Palin

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Sarah Palin (history, logs)

Article: Sarah Palin

Score: -1

Nominated by: Jayseki 08:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
For: 7
  1. Symbol for vote For.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:03, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. Symbol for vote For. Sure. Rather of lot of people have chipped into writing this one. It's a great example of how a collaboration involving a large number of different users can create something good. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 17:11, Oct 19
  3. For. Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 17:23, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
  4. Symbol for vote For. JudgeZarbi Icons-flag-gb TALK 17:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
  5. For. I want an article on Sarah Palin's cat, too.   Le Cejak <17:28 Oct 19, 2008>
  6. Symbol for vote For. You betcha' Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:08, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
  7. Symbol for vote For. she was just on SNL, and right now is she is (most likely) as well-known as she is going to get Jayseki 21:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Against: 8
  1. Against, not in its current form at least. There are some good parts, but there are too many random sections (feature film?) and dumb pictures. It feels like it's been written by several different authors. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:12, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. Symbol against vote Not Foar. Sorry, didn't find that very funny at all, and it was obviously done by many people 9its poorly put together. And the amount of pictures severely outweigh the amount of text, and don't add anything. Icons-flag-pi Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 22:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
  3. I have a fedora. No subtlety to speak of, just more of the same crap that one finds easily by mashing Random Page. Ж Kalir with all the grace of a tin can 01:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
  4. Against. Too inconsistent. Still needs work. I mean, it's wayyyy better than it was, and wayyy better than I first expected, but still very patchy. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:18, Oct 20
  5. Symbol against vote Not for Has good parts but other sections are inconsistent or simply just random. Smooth out the style and give it a more consistent tone and then I'll vote for. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 09:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
  6. Against - It's like lipstick on Joe the Plumber's asscrack. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 14:08, Oct. 20, 2008
  7. Nah. Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:23, Oct 20
  8. against. much better than pretty much all of the current event-y articles being mucked up by IPs, kudos to you guys who have made it a solid article, but i still feel like it's not quite front page ready. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Abstain I don't even think this lady deserves an article. If she gets one, I demand that my cat gets and article as well! And not just an UnNews or a poem! I'm talking about a full article, dammit! I'm serious. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 17:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
    • Dexter, Dexter... Always talking about pussies... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 17:22, Oct 19
  • 15Mickey20 The feature film section has been removed... Trouble is... This HAS been written by a lot of different authors... Maybe the style can be smoothed out a bit... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 22:08, Oct 19
  • It could be better... there's still too many bad pictures, and the text could be made more consistent. The email hacking bit doesn't do it for me. But it's close! And I think it deserves a good article. Spang talk 23:17, 19 Oct 2008


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools