For, obviously. I'm from Easter Island. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 13:03, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
For. Where's Iraq? I thought it was trinity? Anyway I vote yes, because it's not supposed to be satire, nor silly, it's supposed to be funny. And it is! Funnybony 19:15, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
for. when VFH is slow, we apparently turn into moduspedia. this is a good thing. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 01:23, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
Mork mork mork! Sweden. FEAR SWEDEN! •••Necropaxx(T){~}05:01, Oct 1
For. Countries that rhyme with "Bizreal". --UU - natter09:45, Oct 2
For. modusopedia, you say •FreddAin't Dedd•••13:17October2 '09
For. hilarious 71.63.120.150 04:41, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 3
Weak Against. It's pretty good, but it's very silly as opposed to very satirical, which is what the angle should be. —UnführerGuildyRittervonGuildensternenstein 15:10, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
Against very strong intro, but then a list article? Come on MO. --THINKER 10:00, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Where is the LAW that Uncyclopedia article MUST be Satire, but NOT "Funny" or "Silly"? And WHAT exactly is the difference? How can an article be satire without being both silly AND funny? Is not FUNNY the trip? It might be a better idea to distinguish funny from funny, after all, there MUST be a difference between funny and funny!? And we can only use the RIGHT funny, otherwise it's off to the unRe-education camps.--Funnybony 19:54, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. The intro ought to be cut down or removed into the notes section. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 23:41, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. The only thing missing here is a bucket of bad puns. That would be hell-arious! JoeMonco 12:13, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
Featured. ~ 16:50, October 9, 2009 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 9 October 2009. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.