For. Well done! However, it's hard to adapt to the writer's tone, when he switches it from en- to un- cyclopedic and backwards. Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:47, November 25, 2013 (UTC)
Tentative for. I assume you'll heed Anton's advice and either choose one tone of writing...or give a better reason to switch back and forth. --ShabiDOO 03:16, December 6, 2013 (UTC)
Against. This is epic good writing and I welcome it to the encyclopedia. (The extremist spin is not its only humor; it also makes real points about the silliness that happens when various people "play the race card.") But an alternate point-of-view is a hard sell, and even with the template (which would not appear on the main page if featured), an alternate-POV article on racism, where we put a bit of the Intro on the main page and ask the passing reader to understand that "it's not us talking but Conservapedia," is problematic. SpıkeѦ 12:18 23-Nov-13
I edited the banner on the top of the page to be a bit more appropriate. For this article, I wasn't really parodying Conservapedia, but rather YouTube commenters who seem to dominate most political videos. You know who I'm talking about, the ones who say how the sheeple need to wake up and vote for Ron Paul, how the Holocaust was a "Holohoax", how the liberal Jews control the media through Honey Boo Boo and Kim Kardashian, how the anti-white genocide is constantly being ignored, how Zimmerman can't be a racist because he's Hispanic, how Michelle Obama is an "ape woman", how it's okay to use the n-word but not the word "cracka", how black people have a genetic disorder that causes them to commit the most crimes, how Alex Jones is a Zionist disinfo agent, how David Duke is a sane and rational human being, how homosexuality is "of the Devil", how E.T. Williams, Pastor Manning, and Alan Keyes are the only sane black men, etc.--EpicWinner (talk) 03:25, November 25, 2013 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. Won't get the votesRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 22:40, December 29, 2013 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.