For. Whoever wrote this has style, class, and sobriety. In the game of Scrabble he's playing at the moment. It's not a high-scoring one. --UU - natter21:10, Mar 6
For. Written (I presume) by a writer with a bi-polar condition - though that isn't alluded to in the text. Otherwise it is very well written and cleverly interweaves the 'pro' and 'anti' elements to make it a feature. My only other point is whether the 'anti' in green typeface is a contrast enough to standard text. Perhaps a darker green? RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:25, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
Featured. ChiefjusticeDS 10:13, March 23, 2011 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 23 March 2011. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.