Uncyclopedia:VFH/Playstation Three

Score: 0 mutilated penises

1. Browsing through the Quasi-featured pages this one just stood out like a big crooked mutilated hard-on. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:14, November 25, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. Mattsnow 02:38, November 25, 2012 (UTC)
3. For. SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 18:43, November 25, 2012 (UTC)
4. FOR Makes me laugh a lot. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:23, November 25, 2012 (UTC)
5. For. I've always adored this article ShabiDOO 23:01, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
6. For. Funnier than any of the other nominations I've looked at Murder Frog ✄ Dull interest wanes. 05:31, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

1. Against. Meh. MikeGod (Parliamo) 05:15, November 25, 2012 (UTC)
2. Against. How was this even "quasi-featured" on an 8-7 vote last time? To paraphrase Nikau in that vote, there is too little basis for equating the PS3 with My Penis. Main page features especially should not pursue amusement of the author over benefit to the reader. Spıke Ѧ 13:32 25-Nov-12
3. Against - It's lacking. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 20:18, Nov. 25, 2012
4. Against. Per my last Against. --Lord Scofield Stark 10:21, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
5. Limp boner. -RAHB 06:31, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
6. Against. A mess RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:23, December 6, 2012 (UTC)

• If looking for quasi-featured articles to try again, Kerala was refined during the VFH process, which was derailed by a couple of Pakistanis (perhaps voting against anything from India) who never returned. Spıke Ѧ 13:32 25-Nov-12

  No one gives a shit about your shitty, completely unrelated article. If you want to suck your own dick so much on someone else's nomination page, then how about you quit the site and never come back? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:22, November 25, 2012 (UTC)

   Kip likes this

  -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 20:18, Nov. 25, 2012

• Comment. I suggest we cut back on the mini essays on reasons to vote for or against and also lay off on the personal stuff too. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:35, November 25, 2012 (UTC)

   Socky agrees

  —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:54, 26 November 2012

  • Hahahaha. It's so funny how worked up people can get over the featuring of articles on a commedy website. --ShabiDOO 14:54, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
• It is a shame that articles like this don't get featured. There are many amusing articles on Uncyclopopesponge, but few that make you laugh out loud like this one. Trouble is, the ones that genuinely make people spunk their cat make other people arrange ornaments on their fireplace. Mildy amusing, well prensented articles always win over inventive and exciting stuff these days. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:33, December 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • I have been thinking this for some time, only I wasn't able to put it as well as Mattlobster has. There is a lowest common denominator effect when selecting some articles. --ShabiDOO 11:40, December 5, 2012 (UTC)
• Comment. Wait, you're saying cock jokes are "not" the lowest common denominator? :D Leverage (talk) 11:34, December 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Fart jokes and bathroom humour is not necesarily a low form of humour, well written fart jokes are not easy either, just read any ancient Greek or Roman commedy. And in any case, it's only part of the content of an article, not the main content, and rarely the concept of an article. There's a lot of drab, and at times clever but conceptless, makes you sort of chuckle, predictable, overly descriptive and unexciting unsurprising uninspiring articles about. At least PS3 has that, even if it's not hate literature? At least this is ripping helarious for those who like that style of writing. --ShabiDOO 16:05, December 7, 2012 (UTC)