Uncyclopedia:VFH/Pile of Enormous Socks of Genoa

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Pile of Enormous Socks of Genoa (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Pile of Enormous Socks of Genoa	Score: 11 things those Pisans have got nothing on
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:46, 11 November 2009
For: 15	It's a Pile of Socks. Enormous Socks. Of Genoa. WOOO! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:46, 11 November 2009 Oh, what the hey. It's well-written, and brought many chuckles. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:58, Nov It's short, but it works. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 05:40, November 12, 2009 (UTC) Charming --monika 05:53, November 12, 2009 (UTC) For. I vote for anything. :) • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 15:36, November 12, 2009 (UTC) Self-for. I kind of like this one. pillow talk 23:15, November 12, 2009 (UTC) For. I found this really, really stupid. But also well-written and funny. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 05:34, November 13, 2009 (UTC) For. Not pants. MrN  Fork you! 01:56, Nov 14 For. As a general rule, enormous versions of every-day items are hilarious. -- Also, penis. 21:36, November 17, 2009 (UTC) For. Two or three good chuckles for me. Adequate.  GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 07:22, November 25, 2009 (UTC) For. Style  Guide 15:16, November 26, 2009 (UTC) For. Chyel 17:50, November 27, 2009 (UTC) For Sir Roger 05:18, December 2, 2009 (UTC) For. ~ 16:46, Dec 2, 2009 16:46, December 2, 2009 (UTC) For. ~ 11:22, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 4	Against. Starts off well and then seems to be in a hurry to finish. Therefore looks at best incomplete or half an idea not fully executed. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:58, November 15, 2009 (UTC) Huh     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   21:53, Sunday 15 November 2009   Against. As per Romartus. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:47, November 26, 2009 (UTC) Against. Per above. It's also a little bit short. Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 09:00, Nov. 29, 2009
Comments	Abstain. I really like what's there and I think the article is more than funny enough to warrant featuredom. However, I'm greedy and want more. I think there needs to be one more section (perhaps focusing on the response of the Pisans or technical specifications). Maybe you could also do some sock equivalent of those pictures where tourists hold up the Tower of Pisa. It would be a shame to feature it before it is as good as it could be. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  22:44, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.