Against until another proofreading this thing is still full of glaring errors that even I, an oft mistake maker, can't overlook. And honestly, its a little bland, but I'll give it another sitting post further fixering. --THINKER 05:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Per Thinker Even the first sentence seems to have no meaning. Stop switching between tenses mid-sentence, and a lot of the other grammatical mistakes. Then we'll see about considering voting when I can understand it. -RAHB 06:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Against. Per the above, really. There's some good stuff in there, but it does need a good old grammar/readability fix-up before it looks like a feature. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee15:57, Jun 10
Against - I just went through the whole thing and fixed most of the prose... but I still don't think it's funny. --Hyperbole 16:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. Very Low health (0%)TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 19:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.