From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Nursery (history, logs)

Article: Nursery

Score: 16 Eloquent Toddlers

Nominated by: Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 15:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
For: 18
  1. nom&for. Orian57 brings us another disturbingly authentic depiction of life through the eyes of a child. --Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 15:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. For I like Sonje because she nominated my story which is much better than anything Thomas can do -- he can't even do finger paintings, you have to put the paint on the page not your mouth and he's stupid because he doesn't know that! ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 15:59 22 May 2009
  3. Symbol for vote For. A good nomination ! --Romartus 17:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
  4. For per what I said earlier. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:58, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
  5. Eh, sure. Still a few things i'd like to see fixed that I pointed out in my review, but it's good enough as it is. Saberwolf116 03:25, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  6. For --Nikau 03:33, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  7. For. per above. Mnb'z 01:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  8. For. This is well written in the style it's trying to capture. It's funny, and satirical, but not exactly witty. It also has the feel of a featured article. I.E. it isn't really a specific kind of article, like history-themed or science -themed or something like that. It's got a fairly neutral theme. Hardly a line out of place. Very good. Dorsalfrog Prime 01:52, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  9. fwhore Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 15:37 May 25 '09
  10. For sure. T. (talk) 22:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  11. For Great article, friends laughed, I chuckled. - - - Atom Silly Angel AtomSpeak Atom Contribs Atom 23:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  12. For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  13. Symbol for vote For. Oooh, it's got little kids in it! Another funny article from Mr. Oriano. Sheesh. - [08:17 26 May 2009] PlebYettie
  14. For. This is funny, therefore I vote for. --UU - natter UU Manhole 12:58, May 26
  15. For User:Zeitgeist/sig 18:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  16. Yeah. Yeah. Icons-flag-it.png Don 15px-AAN.jpg20px-Oberst.jpg Puttano cHeDDs 15px-Jenny_Spy_Revised_Again.jpg 19px-Leprechaun_army.jpg 15px-TMMAN.jpeg 20px-Missmurder.jpeg 15px-SCBBQGPOS.jpg SBQ2 19:16,26May,2009 19:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  17. For -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN23:03, 26 May
  18. Strong For Despite the fact I think Mr.Orian should branch out from his first-person genre. But then again, he is really good at it so who am I to judge?    Tagstit    talk    contribs    awards   23:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Against: 2
  1. Against Been done by you before, and in a funnier manner. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 03:00, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
You seem to be on VFH solely to vote against articles. Saberwolf116 03:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Sure, why not? --Nikau 03:36, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  1. Against. Didn't enjoy it. --Docile hippopotamus 06:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. This made me sad, because it just didn't have the magic of the sandcastle one. :( Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:16, May 26
  • Abstain per DJ. I don't know why, but I'm pretty tired of the first-person genre. Don't cry, little one! It's not you: it's me.   Le Cejak <7:08 May 23, 2009>
  • On the second read it is rather charming so who am I to say no. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 11:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. Looks like this one is in the bag - - - Atom Silly Angel AtomSpeak Atom Contribs Atom 23:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools