Weak For. Its funny, but I do question how many people will get the reference. Mn-z 17:52, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
For. I was going to make a joke about this being featured in the "not-too-distant future", but decided against it. —UnführerGuildyRittervonGuildensternenstein 19:40, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
Against Cute, and manages to stay above water conceptually. As a diehard MSTie, I could very, very easily be enraged by the mere approach of the subject, and thankfully, I am not. However, it still snags on a number pitfalls and doesn't fully deliver. Fine addition to the site; not FA material. --THINKER 08:23, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
Against. As The Thinker said, it doesn't feel like a feature to me. ChiefjusticeDS 16:26, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
abstain. i can't say i know enough about this to find it funny. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 02:24, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. Per Gerry. But with capital letters in the appropriate places, natch. --UU - natter09:51, Oct 2
Abstain. Borders on superior fancruft..not sure about it even now. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 23:49, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. I can see 'this being featured in the "not-too-distant future"' with some rewriting. I find it well-written, but a little obscure and confusing. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 20:25, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm 21% +8 QFA~ This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 19:57, November 4, 2009 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.