Miracle Science (history, logs)

Article: Miracle Science

Score: 12 "poof"ters

Nominated by: PoliszSir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj KUN 16:20, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
For: 13
  1. Nom and for A fine article from Socky. That's enough for me to vote for. PoliszSir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj KUN 16:20, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol for vote SelfFor. Yay! Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:22, 30 January 2011
  3. For. ~ MimoMimomaxusMaxus 16:30, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  4. For. Mrowa 16:33, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
    It'll do, and it is better than it was, but I'm still not fond of how it starts in one direction and kind of goes off in another. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 16:39, 30 January 2011
  5. For. Yes Dr. Fenwick 04:18, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
  6. For. My god its brilliant! Shabidoo 08:38, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol for vote For. The next level has been broached. We must all work harder now. Fuck you Socky, may your mother do something something in hell. Aleister 12:04 31-1-'11
  8. Yes sir, I CAN boogie... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  9. For. Perhaps some of the later paragraphs are a bit short but otherwise seems a feature to me. LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:53, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
  10. For. It all makes so much sense now. --UU - natter UU Manhole 12:36, Feb 2
  11. Looks good to me. --Black Flamingo 17:40, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
  12. Actually, it seems fine now... 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 03:57, 13 February 2011
  13. Symbol for vote For. Though I agree with Sycamore on one thing. THIS SHOULD BE FEATURED ON CONSERVAPEDIA TOO! Scofield 09:02, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 1
  1. Against. It reads like a Conservapedia comedy article. Very ignorant throughout, and a very poor hack job from Dark Science. Needs a re work to incoporate the fundamental flaw in the core argument that runs through the piece. Sycamore (Talk) 19:26, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Actually, yes. Screw what I said about goodness; it could be so much better! *shakes a fish at Socky* I'll sit here until you make it better, dammit. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 19:29, 30 January 2011
    Yeah, keep working on it. Polish it until it's featured, and even then, you will know what to do. Something this good should be something this good, so continue, sleepless, without food if need be, perfect this cookie. Aleister 12:06 31-1-11
  • Wow, Romartus approved the article! I think the voting is over and it should be immediately featured on the main page! PoliszSir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj KUN 13:15, February 2, 2011 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.