Self-nom and for. I've done.... a crap-ton of work on this over the years. It is supposed to be extremely convoluted, but not overly confusing. I can't say that I succeeded, but I hope I did. TheWoodburninatorMinimal Effort™ 06:25, September 15, 2012 (UTC)
Against. Sort of per my vote on Slender. I need more than an explanation of the core concept but with sarcasm replacing encyclopedia in the tone for it to be funny for me. Otherwise well-written. -RAHB 00:17, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
Against -- Rei (talk) 08:43, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I assume that most people won't know the game really. The article tries its best to explain the game to anyone, regardless of if they have played it or not. TheWoodburninatorMinimal Effort™ 03:15, September 20, 2012 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm >20% low healthTKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 08:18, October 17, 2012 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.