Self-nom and for. I've done.... a crap-ton of work on this over the years. It is supposed to be extremely convoluted, but not overly confusing. I can't say that I succeeded, but I hope I did. TheWoodburninatorMinimal Effort™ 06:25, September 15, 2012 (UTC)
Against. Sort of per my vote on Slender. I need more than an explanation of the core concept but with sarcasm replacing encyclopedia in the tone for it to be funny for me. Otherwise well-written. -RAHB 00:17, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
Against -- Rei (talk) 08:43, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
Comment. Can't really say on this one as I don't know the game. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:46, September 19, 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I assume that most people won't know the game really. The article tries its best to explain the game to anyone, regardless of if they have played it or not. TheWoodburninatorMinimal Effort™ 03:15, September 20, 2012 (UTC)
w00t! 3 votes on this in a whole week! It could be a record or something!!! TheWoodburninatorMinimal Effort™ 23:15, September 22, 2012 (UTC)
4!!! Do I hear more? This thing could get to 6 by early next month!!! TheWoodburninatorMinimal Effort™ 05:28, September 25, 2012 (UTC)
At this rate, 6 will be blown WAY out of the water. We could get as many as 7 votes on this thing before it is destroyed!!! TheWoodburninatorMinimal Effort™ 02:02, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
Abstain. I had a go but can't really understand the article and what it is about. That's just me. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:31, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm >20% low healthTKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 08:18, October 17, 2012 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.