Self-Bless It ended with 23 for votes last time, and I think a main problem was timing. There was always 1 or 2 articles a couple votes higher, but if I got that same score again, it would probably lead to a feature. DonPuttanocHeDDs 22:55,10June,2009
Against until the article is changed according to advice given in a second pee review (the first is from May 5th, and was overly praising), then I'll at least abstain again. Le Cejak•<23:15 Jun 10, 2009> okay, he's taking care of it. Le Cejak•<23:19 Jun 10, 2009>
Abstain. Cheddar's a good writer, but this is just as creepily violent as the last time I read it. It hasn't changed at all since it was last nommed. At LEAST let the author address some of our concerns before renomming, DH! Le Cejak•<23:03 Jun 10, 2009>
In all fairness, most of the against didn't like anything about the article, and the concerns were that it wasn't good. Not many specifics. DonPuttanocHeDDs 23:05,10June,2009
Yeah, that's true. That's usually how it works, but maybe it should go up on Pee Review to give those people a chance to spell out what's wrong. Make the article less violent and get it reviewed and make changes, and I may vote for. Le Cejak•<23:10 Jun 10, 2009>
Will do. I'm gonna go put it on Pee Review again. DonPuttanocHeDDs 23:17,10June,2009
The nomination was not successful. Yes, let's just renom everything that fails VFD a minute after we close the nomination. I don't want to see this piece for at least a month~ This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 07:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.