Uncyclopedia:VFH/Joseph Conrad

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Joseph Conrad (history, logs)

Article: Joseph Conrad

Score: 15 Hearts of Darkness

Nominated by: Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 15:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
For: 15
  1. Nom&For. Conrad's life through the eyes of Marlow on crack, great stuff. --Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 15:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  2. For. Heart of Darkness is a fantastic book. I'd vote even if I had only seen Apocalypse Now. Oh and the article is great. --SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:49, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  3. Very For. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:55, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  4. Self for yes, I'm pathetic--CrabPope 16:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  5. Symbol for vote For. I am presuming this is written 'at the time' - i.e. 1920s ? If you are going to imitate the style of writing of a certain historical period for parody then some use of language is acceptable for me at least. --Romartus 10:46, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
    It's written in the style of one of Conrad's novels, Heart of Darkness. Marlow is the protagonist, who narrates the entire story from his experience in imperialist Africa. One key relevance is that Marlow (in this article) is talking about Joseph Conrad similar to how he did in the book itself when he spoke about the person he was looking for, a man named Kurtz. Read the book, it's a change from the African civil war tales you get these days. --SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 17:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  6. Symbol for vote For. Nice article. Zeitgeist 13:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  7. Symbol for vote For.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:44, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
  8. Symbol for vote For. - David Gerard 13:13, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
  9. For. Nicely done, and a good read. The book pisses me off immensely though. (I also agree with Necropaxx that there may be a "Begad" or two too many). --UU - natter UU Manhole 13:16, Apr 29
  10. for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
  11. for --Moneke 14:38, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
  12. Hesitent and Half-Sympathic For, but For not the less. It is quite esoteric, and I have the feeling it will go over most readers heads, but it has too much work in it and is too funny for me to vote abstain. Mnb'z 05:54, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
  13. Floor --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 10:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
  14. Ankh smite Bless. Ra-approved Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 10:24, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
  15. Symbol for vote Begads! -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  12:40, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Against: 0

No against votes

  • Comment. Every section should be in double quotes 00:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Abstain. I wanted to like this, I really did, but the style with its gazillions of "Begad!"s kind of killed it for me. Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:25, Apr 27
  • Symbol delete vote Abstain I think it's funny in its own sense, but I'm kind of gettin tired of these formal articles about old guys. There have been like 8 of the featured in the last week.--SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 22:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools