SERIOUS REVAMP HAS JUST TAKEN PLACE - PLEASE RECONSIDER.--Funnybony 19:45, Nov 16
Against Changed my vote after being privvy to some inside information about this article. It will comeback at some point, and I'll be waiting for it with a shotgun and a yes vote. Aleister 11:43 17 11
Here’s an article on a real subject, a famous actor. It’s not even remotely funny that he’s an actor, good or bad. Wikipedia gives us the drab, boring content. But this Uncyclopedia version is funny, in my opinion. And it’s not a spork. I hope you agree and feature this lovable wise guy. If he can be featured then I must be on the right track here and I'll be qualified to write a funny enough article on Sam Worthington. Otherwise, having no article at all is better than having a bad spork - which could embarrass this humble UnWiki. I (being a shameless whore among shameless whores) hope you enjoy this, and vote YES. Here is the Pee Review by Sequence dated 9 August 2009. So it’s no rush job to VFH.--Funnybony 12:16, Nov 7
The nomination was not successful. Nominator requestChiefjusticeDS This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 12:24, November 17, 2010 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.