Nom and For. Better written and more convincing that most of the real "logical" articles I've seen out there. Also Sophia told me when I wrote my Pee Review that I had to nominate or she'd make sure I could no longer multiply. FatherWHY???(confessions) 05:03, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
For. Can I vote twice? StyleGuide 06:49, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
For. Bloodlink 24.161.79.170 20:44, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
For. It's a goer now for me (in the VFH sense). RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:39, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 0
No against votes
Comments
Comment. For. StyleGuide 06:50, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. Sorry, I can't stand the incorrect use of mathematical logic. Not even for humor. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 01:50, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. It is a very clever and well written article. Just not sure if is a contender for VFH. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:05, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Featured. •Spang•☃•talk• 01:55, 05 Dec 2009 This article has passed VFH and was featured on 5 December 2009. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.