Uncyclopedia:VFH/Illogicopedia

Score: 10.5 bananas in frocks

1. Obviously I'm biased, but I find this hilarious. Although Hindleyite being the writer that he is, maybe I won't be the only one amused by this after all... 1234 ~ 02:44, 21 August 2011
2. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:45, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
3. For. MadMax 04:57, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
4. For. R those red links on purpose? Funnybony  08:36, Aug 21 08:36, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
5. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:01, 21 August 2011
6. For. I haven't laughed this hard--even on Illogicopedia--for quite some time. Cheers, Dan. 70.179.48.140 20:20, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
7. For. Why not? (talk)(contributions) DJ Mixerr 02:32, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
8. For. I think it balances getting across the ?pedia style with the, ahem, Uncle Pete style well enough. --UU - natter 12:15, Aug 22
9. Sure. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:05, 22 Aug
10. For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:07, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
11. I hate turtles —Mnid , a bad selection. (TALK) (Awards) (n/a) (More Stuff) BEL 01:57, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
12. For nonsense done right. Funky Monk 13:00, August 26, 2011 (UTC)
13. I'm an Illogicopedian, and if this gets featured, I'm going to nominate Illogicopedia's article for Uncle Pete Uncyclopedia to be featured. ~ 04:54, 08/28/2011
14. For. -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 28 August 2011, at 05:13
15. For. Jmplayer 20:22, August 30, 2011 (UTC)
16. For. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 03:15, August 31, 2011 (UTC)

1. Against. This article has no teeth. Too bland mAttlobster. (hello) 09:28, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
2. Against. I agree with mattlobster this is a little bland. Dr. Fenwick 23:10, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
3. Against. Gushing, someone else's navelism. --RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 13:43, August 25, 2011 (UTC) 13:42, August 25, 2011 (UTC)
4. Against, not really my cup of tea. Sorry. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
5. Against. Not a noteworthy topic. --EMC ^[TALK] 23:02 Aug 31 2011