Uncyclopedia:VFH/Ignorance not bliss new study finds

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnNews:Ignorance not bliss, new study finds (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:Ignorance not bliss, new study finds	Score: 10
Nominated by:	Leverage (talk) 21:20, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
For: 10	For. » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 21:49 September 28 For. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 17:14, September 29, 2012 (UTC) For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:23, September 29, 2012 (UTC) For. Spıke ¬ 19:14 29-Sep-12 Boner. Could be slightly more deadpan, as to SPIKE's point. Got me laughing though. -RAHB 01:17, September 30, 2012 (UTC) For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:15, September 30, 2012 (UTC) For. Mattsnow 14:54, October 1, 2012 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:10, 1 October 2012 Partial-For. Casting a +0.5 vote. Nah, make it a +0.3183 vote. -- Rei (talk) 08:51, October 3, 2012 (UTC) Forforfor Aleister 16:40 October 4
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	Not based on real news, but definitely takes the piss out of real news. The obscenities jump the shark and get in the way of the parody; if it weren't for them and the article were a bit more deadpan rather than pressured, I'd vote for. Spıke ¬ 22:58 28-Sep-12 Removed a couple of obscenities. Better? 216.162.223.91 23:40, September 28, 2012 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.