Nom+For VFH is a little empty right now. Here's something Black Flamingo and I wrote. Dunno why he didn't nom it yet... (talk) 06:04, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
For. I like it Funnybony 11:18, Mar 29 11:18, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
For Cool, it's even better than when it was on VFD for no discernible reason. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 16:38, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
To Jack - because I've been locked away for days by mainstream scientists. They're trying to silence me and they're coming for you too. Don't worry, I told them nothing of our secrets... --BlackFlamingo 20:50, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
Oh yeah, I forgot I authorized that. My bad. (talk) 20:54, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
Against. I was hoping at least a half baked mad idea but in the end this reads more like a re-usable template approach. Don't see it as a feature. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:33, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
Against. Um, tricky. I really want to vote for this for the condiment line alone, and some of it is really good. I just feel that it kind of falls apart as it goes and gets less interesting and less funny. A bit more work, and this would probably be a belter; as it is I'm not quite feeling it. Sorry. --UU - natter08:32, Apr 6
It's... jumpy. Setup's rather rushed, too, but all in all it seems more like a combination of notions than an article, to me. Some rather fine ones, but they... I dunno. 1234~00:23, 8 April 2011
The nomination was not successful. rm, low health 27% - JoS said to.1234~20:29, 23 April 2011 This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 20:29, April 23, 2011 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
(talk) 06:04, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
Sciencey, me like 
20:29, 23 April 2011 
