DIG parody at its finest. A+ --THINKER 14:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Strong For I remember when this took residence at Led Zeppelin. If memory serves, some IP/new user was involved in an edit war over it. I thought it was lost, and I'm really glad it's found again.-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 20:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
For Awesome, awesome, awesome. --THE 23:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
F0r Tihs atricle is rly rly grate!!!!11--74.75.66.199 22:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
YOU DONT NOW SHIT TIL YOUVE HERD DAZD N CONFUZD AKILLYS LAST STAND AND IN THE EVNIG FUKEN AWSOME GITAR SOLLOS JIMI PAGE FUK YERSirCs1987UOTM.t.c 06:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
4rzWow. Colin "All your base" Heaney 22:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
against. Led Zeppelin rules, but not this article. this article isnt funny, its not witty, its just stupid, something I am against on Uncyclopedia. honestly, i dont see why this article wasnt deleted. --Moonzeppelin 00:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Weak Against I get it, it got a chuckle out of me at first. The enthusiastic noob thing has just been done. It also seems rather forced at some points. -RAHB 14:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Something tells me you're missing the point, Kaizer. --THINKER 17:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Comment: I thought the joke would be a bit clearer than it seems to be. In a nutshell, it's a parody of bandcruft. You know, "Liek no wai ur band suxx mine is teh betttr"? - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 22:56, Mar 12
An old Onion article comes to mind: "Local teen discovers Led Zeppelin 40 years after everyone else, acts really annoyingly" --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
I guess the problem with observational comedy is that several people can independently observe the same thing. --Cap'n Sir BenGUNWotMVFHVFP 02:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Or, perhaps, the Onion went forward in time, saw this article, went back in time, and made the news story. IT COULD HAPPEN!-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 02:22, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Nah, I blame the "Infinite number of monkeys With typewriters could eventually churn out two similarly-conceptualized but very differently executed articles about fans of the band Led Zeppelin Theorem." - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 02:32, Mar 13
Comment: Whatchoo guys think, can we strike the latest against vote on grounds of...er, slight bias against the subject matter? - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 01:10, Mar 14
Nay People can vote against for mostly any reason they want. If it's because they are the very subject of the article...well, let's just allow the humor of it to sate our appetites.-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 01:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I suppose so. I guess I'll never understand why some people just can't take satire of their favorite band...such is the nature of musical taste, I suppose, and the source of bandcruft. - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 01:53, Mar 14
I should mention, having written all this bile against teenage Led Zeppelin fans, I used to be one myself. I'm still a fan, just no longer a teenager. --Cap'n Sir BenGUNWotMVFHVFP 03:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Featured. and it's another one for the Cap'n ~ 21:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 20 March 2008. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.