Nom+for Written by some unknown individual. Got more than enough giggles out of me. MrNFork you! 19:17, Oct 22
For Listen, people. I read in some encyclopedia that anyone can edit that one of the ideals of satire is to bring about change in the thing being satirized. If you love America (but despise hideous opportunism), you will vote for this article to be highlighted twice. This is what satire is, and this is what satire is for. That's all, thank you (and I'll just leave the soap box right here, I'm sure someone else will want to use it). --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 22:38, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
For. Amazing. 70.179.49.110 18:39, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 4
Against. Now don't get me wrong. This is not because I was offended. Put the noose away. I thought that while parts of it were funny (dust bunnies, for example), the rest of the article is mired in near-incoherence, dullness, and awful formatting. This has a lot of work left. •••Necropaxx(T){~}Friday, 03:39, Oct 23 2009
Against. Besides the self reference to a certain website...is this really any good for a VFH ? I am also not a fan of the idiot narrator approach either . RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 11:33, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
Against. While I like the idea, and some of the stuff, I ended up being more confused than amused. There's a brilliant article to be got from this, but at the moment it's a way off where it should be, for me. --UU - natter11:56, Oct 28
Comment. Holy crap! Thank you Mr. N, however I would like some feedback on this first. It really is "nearly incoherent" Le Cejak•<1:42 Oct 27, 2009> 01:42, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. Here's some feedback. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA. It's meant to be like that cos it's silly. The author does stuff like that sometimes. MrNFork you! 22:14, Oct 27
The nomination was not successful. rm 11% +1~ This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 20:20, October 28, 2009 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Fork you! 19:17, Oct 22
