Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Become a king

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

HowTo:Become a king (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: HowTo:Become a king	Score: 4 Slayed Dragons
Nominated by:	CrabPope 14:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
For: 10	Nom and for I like it. --CrabPope 14:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC) Super Bless Nice job little Mahm00sh. Don Puttano cHeDDs 15:43,23May,2009 I like it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:07, 23 May 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 00:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC) Thanks Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 10:43 May 24 '09 For Love it--Iwillkillyou333 02:14, 25 May 2009 (UTC) roF. —The la Zhel 10:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC) For Sexy Chick Zeitgeist 18:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC) For. Dame 23:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC) For Staircase CUNt 17:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Against: 6	Against. I hate HowTos. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 10:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC) Unless you have an actual reason, this is invalid vote. ~ 13:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC) sir, this isnt a proper reason for an against vote Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 10:43 May 24 '09 The weird little guy is right. Allow me to quote from the book of VFH. "Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded." So please find another reason to hate this. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:50, 24 May I have other reasons as well, like I didn't think it was funny, and in fact, found nothing even remotely chuckleworthy within it. My stated reason for voting against is my general dissatisfaction with the HowTo namespace, in that they are written in the same, predictable manner, and therefore are not funny. May I unstrike my vote now? Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 07:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the compliments, sir. :/ Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 17:20 May 27 '09 Yep. ~ 08:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Against. written in cliche second person style. Mnb'z 01:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC) It may be a bit cliché, but it's been a while since we had something like this featured. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:44, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Something in 2nd person, or something about becoming king? Don Puttano cHeDDs 13:52,25May,2009 Against. Lame. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:26, May 26 Weak against It pains me to say this but, for what is a brilliant idea, this needs a cleanup. I really think you should have waited for a review before nomming. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Copy/Paste what the DJ said. Respect the PEE. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:36, 28 May I didnt nom it, crabpope did. And it was on pee review before he did. Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 14:44 May 28 '09 Understood. The point remains. Get a pee and fix it up a bit and I'd probably vote for. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:09, 28 May Against. Can't vote for at the moment, but there's plenty of potential. A really good polish and this could shine. --UU - natter 10:12, May 29
Comments	Abstain. This seems to be the 'house style' for the HowTo series. I know - I have done a couple and they look like this. Odd. --Romartus 11:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC) The sex change part goes a bit far I think. --Nikau 08:26, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH