For I liked it --I'mthedaddy 20:46, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
for i'll like it pretty soon, Shroom has some edits to make and I'll assume good faith -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!)21:20, Oct 10
Against: 4
Nah Felt like a rather average article, plus the pictures need work. Clipart mad scientist and its caption; really? --SirDJ~Irreverent 23:22, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Against. per above. Mn-z 16:00, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
Against. So very close to success, some more work needed though. ChiefjusticeDS 18:02, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
and god damn your asking for help on someones talk page, made me feel bad about being an ass. fuck this shit -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!)18:39, Oct 10
Comment. I feel parts of this are great! But too many aren't for me to vote for yet. And where's the clipart scientist? I didn't see it. Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 16:37, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
Comment.I'm sorry, I don't see how random text means against. Therefore, your "against" or whatever is invalid.-Almost SirRandomCrap
Counter-Comment cheater, you're just trying to invalidate all the against votes. -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!)18:21, Oct 10
also VFH is not a discussion page, so I feel obligated not to discuss what "sfadjkvgto ijl;okdf" means -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!)18:23, Oct 10
No. Against WILL mean Against. Your drivel is not "against". Also, ell me why said article is so bad, and why you are so stubborn.-Almost SirRandomCrap
The nomination was not successful. rm 17% +1~ This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 21:23, October 10, 2009 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.