Uncyclopedia:VFH/Homophones (grammar)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Homophones (grammar) (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Homophones (grammar)	Score: 12 butts on the line
Nominated by:	Aleister
For: 13	Nom&shelfor This seems in heat. Happy Monkey grabbed me and forced it out of me, then threw it. A great tatochop by BB near the page's end. Aleister 17:19 25-2-'12 For. RegularUndies . 05:52, February 26, 2012 (UTC) For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:57, February 26, 2012 (UTC) For? From what I could gather, the article was a pun on homophones (homo-phones?), everything else I couldn't understand, what with the article being almost entirely incomprehensible. That being said, I have choosen to vote for due to the likely community ostracization that would occur otherwise and for my respect to this kind and cordial user, self nominating his own article notwithstanding.--CameHereInACloche (Talk) 06:02, February 26, 2012 (UTC) Kind? Cordial? Ostrichionization? Couch? I don't understand a word you said. Aleister 8:02 26-2-'12 Ich lieben Deutch milch. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 08:10 26 February 2012 WOAH! You really shouldn't vote for something unless you like it. You could chose to simply NOT vote against or leave a comment if you think theres something wrong with it. Even better, say what you think is wrong with it and the author might make some last minute changes. I think there are VERY few people here who are vindictive with their votes and definately NOT Aleister...of all people. --ShabiDOO 18:25, February 27, 2012 (UTC) This seems nice. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 07:09 26 February 2012 Gunpoint for. Talk! Contribs! 08:32, February 26, 2012 (UTC) For. Mattsnow 10:55, February 26, 2012 (UTC) For --Knucmo2 15:55, February 26, 2012 (UTC) For. Run away hit of Happy Monkey. And I like it. Pup 01:24 27 Feb '12 13:24, February 27, 2012 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:52, 27 February 2012 For. Al Unchained Funnybony  15:05, Feb 27 15:05, February 27, 2012 (UTC) For. A really good article, with several themes and sub themes that fit together really well. Also, extensive editing and rewriting since the competition with some funny improvements :) HMC! ShabiDOO 18:23, February 27, 2012 (UTC) We are all in chains. Black Flamingo 12:58, March 4, 2012 (UTC) For MrN  Fork you! 17:43, Mar 12
Against: 1	Against. It's an article that has run away with itself in my view. There are some good ideas here but why cram them all in the same carriage? RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:50, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	I've reread it and now see why other people would like this article: you took an interesting pun and created this elaborate and complex story about it. Also, the prose has this strange combination of comically-urbane and aged floweryness to it, and that seems funny. But, I just feel that it goes on like stream-of-consciousness, without the consciousness, or the stream. You end up with something similar to rambling, almost. Best of luck to you and your future endeavors, but I have decided to withdraw my vote, which was in poor taste to begin with. Sorry.--CameHereInACloche (Talk) 00:30, February 28, 2012 (UTC) Abstain. The first thing that comes to my mind when one says "homophone" would be a gay phone. Thus, I don't find the article particularly original and a little jumbled as well. Sorry. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:48, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.