Uncyclopedia:VFH/Hiroshima

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Hiroshima (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Hiroshima	Score: 6 beautiful cities... OF DEATH
Nominated by:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:26, August 15, 2012 (UTC)
For: 6	It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:26, August 15, 2012 (UTC) Megatons of fun. Except for this line which I just don't understand: "Due to numerous inlets projected from the body of ketchup". Can somebody explain that to me? -OptyC Sucks! CUN00:36, 16 Aug Vandalism. Oops. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:12, August 16, 2012 (UTC) Triple-testicular boner--Bp2611 13:08, August 16, 2012 (UTC) For. Winstanley1 (talk) 21:11, August 18, 2012 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:36, 19 August 2012 ATOMIC FOR I do like this one. We should bomb it again. Hiroshima means "Fuck me sideways with a cement cutter" in Japanese. True. Aleister 11:45 8-20-'12
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	Comment. The article has a great ironic tone but I found it pretty confusing. I wanted to laugh but I couldn't grab onto anything that would feed me a LOL moment. Sorry ShabiDOO 19:44, August 16, 2012 (UTC) This is one of my pet peeves (I keep it in an aquarium and feed it garden toads) - that articles here should be lol. As I was misinformed, this is a satire site, and satire does not have to be funny, just satirical. Good political and historical satire is a mix of funny and ironic and other things. Just my peeve being let out of its aquarium for a walk in the woods. TFK still sucks, but has a satire bone that's getting better as it ages. Aleister 15:49 8-20-12 Ali...this would be all fine if the article wasn't trying to be funny...however...this article was trying to be funny...and for me...the article didn't acomplish what it was trying to do. If it was purely satire, ironic or sarcastic but not funny nor trying to be funny, I might vote for it. I would love to see more true biting satire outside of unnews. Ontop of that, there are other reasons why I wouldn't vote for it, but I found the "confusing" and "not funny" as very legitimate reasons to not vote for an article, and shared these two examples as constructive criticism, as all uncyclopedians should. --ShabiDOO 00:50, August 21, 2012 (UTC) Comment. I like this article, but it doesn't have a proper ending, or at least not to me. Otherwise I'd vote for.--Snippy 12:30, August 17, 2012 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH