Uncyclopedia:VFH/Grandad Knows Best

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:VFH
Revision as of 22:19, October 12, 2008 by TheLedBalloon (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Grandad Knows Best (history, logs)

Article: Grandad Knows Best

Score: 1 inappropriate Grandparent(s)

Nominated by: Geoff Prickett Icons-flag-gb (Speech)
For: 4
  1. Self For & Nom -- Geoff Prickett Icons-flag-gb (Speech) 21:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. For Although I'm not a fan of the style of writing, kinda confusing at times, this made me laugh. A lot. It could do with some more/better pictures, though. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 20:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
  3. For. I would advocate some polishing, but it's an OK piece. ----OEJ 15:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  4. for with a lower case "L". It could use a good buff up. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Against: 3
  1. Symbol against vote Against. Uncyclopedia is not a place to write lemons. Things that don't work in this article: The concept. Incest isn't funny, it's just incest. Neither is telling little children about incest. If you wanted me creeped out, fine, maybe. But it's not funny. More stuff that doesn't work in this article: Sex. Sex isn't funny, it's just sex. You've just written an entire article about a sexual encounter. If this was fanfiction.net, awesome. This is Uncyclopedia. Other things that don't work: My granddad's penis. True story.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:59 Oct 09, 2008
  2. Nasty. Geoff, although Uncyc is known for its appreciation of sex humor, there is a line, and I think you crossed it. Just a little. Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:11, Oct 9
  3. against as per necro. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
  4. What. The. Fuck. Seems like a disjointed mess. This however is funny. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 10:49, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments
  • Pee Review? Icons-flag-pi Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 22:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Skull When they get to that age, they don't know if they are coming or going... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 01:01, Oct 9
  • Pee Review? Please Check Here! Geoff Prickett Icons-flag-gb (Speech) 05:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Sick stuff and sex are funny subjects. I just watched some League of Gentlemen episodes in which: 1) a coroner described autopsies, denied the existence of God, and implied that he had sex with corpses ("plugged their orifices"); and 2) a female preacher informed a grade-school class that God was going to wreak His most horrible vengeance on them, causing a little boy to collapse in despair across his desk. The argument that incest or offending children is too taboo to be the subject of an Uncyc article is nonsense. Woody Allen satirized sheep-fucking in a movie back in 1972, and it remains classic comedy. Sex is funny as hell! But yes, explicit descriptions of the acts are usually not very effective. In literature, sex is much better implied than described. So I agree that the article could be more satirically sophisticated. The author might also remember the Lolita Lesson: Nabakov turned Humbert's virginal nymphet into a sullen and unpleasant young woman, and thus punctured the fallacy of very young girls as sexual objects. Satire gets interesting when it punctures fallacies. The over-sexualization of society is a very legitimate target for satire, and that might be one place this article could go deeper. ----OEJ 15:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. When you vote against, please be civil: C'mon folks.   Le Cejak <18:36 Oct 11, 2008>

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools
projects