Uncyclopedia:VFH/Gerry Cheevers

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Gerry Cheevers (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Gerry Cheevers	Score: 14 more stitches...
Nominated by:	SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
For: 16	snf. please help me in my quixotic aspiration to be a featured article. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Yep. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:51, Sep 24 Just for you gerry, now get your lazy ass in gear and pee on my shit! Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 22:53, 24 September 2008 (UTC) For. Amy Rose 02:37, 25 September 2008 (UTC) For. Gerry deserves to be featured. Besides, Cheevers is like the best last name EVER. - Velosi-T {] Screech * Vomit * Mutilations [} 18:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC) For. - Agreed — Sir Sycamore (talk) 20:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC) For. MrN  Fork you! 21:03, Sep 26 For. —Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:07, 29 September 2008 (UTC) Weak for. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:40, Sep 30 For I hate vanity pieces, but Gerry has asked nicely, and used the word "quixotic" in the process. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:08, 5 October 2008 (UTC) For. Meh, why not? Plus it has Don Cherry's dog, so it's win. Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 02:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC) For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  14:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC) For. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC) For. JudgeZarbi TALK 15:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Sure. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 20:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC) For. Rather spiffy, even given that I know nothing of the sport in question. --UU - natter 12:44, Oct 6
Against: 2	Doesn't quite keep me entertained the whole way. Usually stuff by GC does, but... --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 10:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Against Just no giggles. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments	*Comment - I like this, but I like TOC. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 21:45, 24 September 2008 (UTC) are you referring to a table of contents? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:20, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Aye;) If its like your thing, I suppose it's not really my place to suggest otherwise, its just that it looks a lot less uncyclopedic. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 19:23, 26 September 2008 (UTC) if you edit the article, remove the __NOTOC__, and hit 'preview', you'll see that in this case the TOC is rather small and not very informative yet still produces a vast quantity of unnecessary ugly whitespace. i do think a TOC is beneficial for articles like Alaska, but not this one. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Heh - You're so vain, you probably think this article is about you. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 10:56, Oct. 2, 2008

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.