Uncyclopedia:VFH/George W. Bush's Weekly Presidential Address: Week of January 25th, 2009

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

George W. Bush's Weekly Presidential Address: Week of January 25th, 2009 (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: George W. Bush's Weekly Presidential Address: Week of January 25th, 2009	Score: 20 more years
Nominated by:	~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 02:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
For: 21	Nom and for Really clever and neat piece of work from our veteran SysRq. Very funny. For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 03:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC) For. Excellent. One of SysRq's best. MrN  Fork you! 03:24, Feb 3 For. It could use a few malapropisms, but it's good as it is. Congraduations to the writifier. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC) I don't know what a malapropism is. —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Nightmarish. –72.193.236.89 07:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC) NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!Help mommy, I dreamed that Bush was President again!Saberwolf116 13:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Self-w♥v. lolbush —Sir SysRq (talk) 14:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Bush Cheney 08. --Nachlader 14:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Nuckler Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC) For. Eight more years! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:30, Feb 3 For.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC) For. --    20:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC) For. Why is it that SysRq articles tend to make me laugh and vomit at the same time? pillow talk 21:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Perhaps I should touch up the section with the vomit orgy at the comedy club. —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC) By malapropisms, I believe Modus means things like this. I dunno, it's a direction to look into. I'm for this either way, though. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 00:29, Feb 4 I know what malapropisms are. —Sir SysRq (talk) 02:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC) You confuse me. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 20:04, Feb 5 Me too. —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC) For And I hope to get some school audio lab time to record it, seeing as my home system sounds like I'm recording in a bulldozer factory. -RAHB 02:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC) For. Simply yay! kit 10:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC) For. definitely. 70.239.163.130 03:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC) For --S'r Mnbvcxz 05:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC) for. i didn't like it until the ending pulled it together. then i liked it. true story. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC) For. Surprisingly good. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC) For. Heh. Heh heh. Heh heh heh. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 01:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC) For. Y'know, I think there could have been more to get from this, but damn me it's good as it is. --UU - natter 11:05, Feb 10 For. -PET 17:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Against: 1	Against Hasn't anyone noticed - he's not the president no more. Vegetationlife 17:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC) How articulate. –72.193.236.89 21:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC) I can state the obvious too: Vegetationlife, you completely miss the point. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Allow me to offer a non-sarcastic remark: The joke is that he thinks he's still president, since there is no difference in his daily routine from when he was president to when he wasn't president. He didn't do anything in office, and so it doesn't feel any different to him. That's the joke. If it changes your mind, great, if it doesn't, no big deal. —Sir SysRq (talk) 23:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Against. Vegetationlife 17:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Vegetationlife, are you trying to negate your first vote? Or is this a strikethrough/no vote an error? My point is if its a simple mistake, then thats that. But it would impact the final vote, unless you wanted it to go to the US Supreme Court for their decision on it. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC) I'm pretty sure it was nothing more than an attempted double-vote that some vigilant user was kind enough to strikethrough. I dunno, I'm too lazy to check the history. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Indeed, I did the strikethroughing so it didn't look like a double vote. I am the greatest, bask in my glory. Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 23:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC) It didn't look like a double vote, it was a double vote. Either way, thank you. =] —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	STOP VOTING YES!!!!!! IS NOBODY PAYING ATTENTION TO THE SCORE TEXT??Saberwolf116 18:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Yay Bush! Eight more years of Bush! Woo! —Sir SysRq (talk) 19:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.