The slow start needs more work. Intro suggests the strategy is not Funny but merely Untrue, and the parade of isms doesn't help. If it is not that geology is funny but that conservatives are ridiculous and here are the untruths they believe: That is a hard sell to the passing reader of our main page. SpıkeѦ 13:23 3-Feb-14
Thanks for the pointers. I tried to put as many jokes as I could into the article. The main point of it was to mock a fundamentalist encyclopedia's page of geology. Also the geological timeline in the article is based on the real geological timeline's names with puns in it and set to biblical timespan. A poke at the absurb use of relics in Catholic Churches is sneaked in as well. SirScottPat (talk) VFHUnSNotMWotMWotY 18:23, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
Comment. Is there any way to change the volcano image (with a face in the smoke)? Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:13, February 20, 2014 (UTC)
The geology timeline seems great, but it is very blurry and it spoils all the humour. It is also one of the most important article's pictures, so only this puts down its quality. Is it possible to improve on it quality? But I know that you have very limited resources... Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 21:07, March 14, 2014 (UTC)
Nought much I can do about that I'm afraid. I recreated the whole image again because my first upload was so blurry. This is my second attempt. I can read the writing and the picture aren't too important (they're just for effect). I considered that good enough because the image quality does not impede the joke. SirScottPat (converse) VFHUnSNotMWotMWotY 09:27, March 16, 2014 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for trying anyway! Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:40, March 16, 2014 (UTC)
Featured. Did the Earth move for you? RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:10, March 17, 2014 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 17 March 2014. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.