Uncyclopedia:VFH/Gay

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:VFH
Revision as of 04:57, December 25, 2007 by Thekillerfroggy (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Gay (history, logs)

Article: Gay

Score: 0 People Person with Barge Poles (fags smoked/fucked).

Nominated by: Well some cigarette and myself have given this page quite an overhaul in the last few weeks, we inherited several thousand edits going back to 2005... I'm not sure if this will go down well as it's rather gay, but hea, have a suck on this. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 19:12, Dec 21
For: 6
  1. For-Well obviously I swallowed it. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 19:35, Dec 21
  2. For I GET IT! ...in bed! oh lord, I'm sorry for that   Le Cejak <-> (Dec 21 / 23:58)
  3. For--Æ 23:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
  4. Obvious forism from co(ish)rewriter. That's not the only reason, of course, why I'm voting for. ~Fag x FS
  5. Symbol for vote If you don't vote for this, you're gay. --General Insineratehymn 01:53, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
  6. For. Surprisingly mature, and pretty funny. I had a few LQTM moments while reading it, which is good enough for a vote from me. I know, I'm too easy. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF (@ 22:59 23 Dec, 2007)
Against: 6
  1. Against. It's a heartfelt effort, I can tell, but it's still just a mess of dirty jokes that seem like they're not even trying to be the Aristocrats. Not only is this confusing to type, it's also not that funny. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 05:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. against. starts out extremely well, featurable material, no question. then it kind of spirals out of control...--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 05:32, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. Against. Yeah, starts well, then goes downhill. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
  4. 4641n57 - I had to go into therapy and have respiratory surgery as a result of reading this. Sorry Mr. N9000 'cause some of it's very good, but we have quality standards around here. Fix the last part and I'll change my vote. --BlueflatcapsigMajor'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 16:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
    Na, I give up. If you know how to improve this please do. I can do no better. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 16:44, Dec 23
  5. Symbol against vote Against. God hates cigarettes! Also, it's not that funny. -->:( 01:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
  6. Symbol against vote OH Crap I am sorry but this one issn't good enough to be featured. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Comments

*Abstain - What the Helen of Troy wuz that? I can't decide if it is funny or flat. On one thing however I'm sure you'll agree, that article had way too many cocks for me! Word. --MaddMax 21:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Too many cocks? So your going to pull out? Dam, that's gay. Fair enough though, there is a risky concept behind this I agree. The idea is to confuse the hell out of the reader... Was it written by a gay basher or a gay? This article is not "mine" I/we inherited the results of a couple of thousand edits going back to 2005. It's not really that funny this, I just thought it was time this was featured... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 21:11, Dec 21
Oh noes. You just made a sex pun. Because I'm black I can live with that, but beacue I'm also 3/4ers other stuff I am most afraid. My Australian side (1/4) is telling me to run and go back to Australia and try to get Emily Browning to marry me. Oh well, she won't, I just have a feeling. But really, I was so perplexed by this that I would need an AMD Athlon 3800+ Processor with a clock cycle of 2.5 nanoseconds and at least 2 GBs of ram to process this. I might also need a 250 GB external hard drive to store the results. Personally folding using my head would be easier (you can rent it for $50 an hour, Stanford, and not that doesn't mean oral sex). Graagh! Yowch. Heh. Cheers. --MaddMax 02:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

*Abs. Ambitious, but could be improved. Btw, I'd keep the back-and-forth commenting brief, or take it to the talk page, lest you want to doom your own nom Mr.N. --THINKER 06:34, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools
projects