Nom & For. I thoroughly enjoyed reviewing this, and present it here for your enjoyment. It's an excellent idea, well written, and has plenty enough funny to deserve your vote. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee09:42, Apr 1
4. What's up with Cajek articles and Mad Libs templates, anyway? I thought that was my gimmick... --L 13:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
S4 Pretty good gimmick: thanks! Le Cejak•<Apr 01, 2008 [13:58]>
F♥r. I too have peed on this article. Why? I have no idea. But doing a review in all caps was relatively irritating to me, so I can't imagine how irritating it must have been to him. Great article. ~MinitrueSirSysRq!Talk!Sex!=/GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:48 Apr 1
For Nice, silly article, but it's the ending that makes it for me. --OptyCSucks! CUN 00:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Featured. Featured +15 SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 20:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 5 April 2008. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.