Against. I'm gonna be a downer here and vote no. I feel like the majority of these "for" votes are just from fanboyism. It's really dry, I smiled maybe once at a joke. I love Futurama, but I don't think this does it full justice. The Priest KingWeinribŽof Jupiter 14:00, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
I can vote what I wanna do. Just not feeling it, sorry. -OptyCSucks! CUN00:04, 15 Sep
Against. What Tourniquet and Opty said zheoliel16:15 September 22
Abstain. - The Groening comment section at the back end is a clever and funny way of looking at futurama but all the preceding fry stuff is unoriginal, being basically just a description of the show - jack mort |cunt| talk - 03:56, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
Good news, everybody! You cannot read those three words without hearing them in Professor Farnsworth's voice! -- Rei (talk) 17:18, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm with the abstainers here. What is the featured article? It's our face. It's our first impression. I am impressed by this effort. I get it and I think it's an excellent colonization. It takes patience and a long attention span, and a great rewarding joke is revealed in the end for the longsuffering. It's a valuable addition to our canon. But it's very possibly a bad choice for featuring, because it asks the reader to work harder than perhaps the featured article should. Still, nice job. --GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shamelessnarcissisticAmerica-hatingliberalatheistaward-winningfeaturedwriter 07:15, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm low health, 16%Chiefjustice32X This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 09:19, September 24, 2012 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.