Self nom + Foruit This is a rewrite. I've been working on it for a little while, and hope I've done a good job. It's apparently pretty good according to some people, so I hope you all agree. Thanks. -- 02:21, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
I liked it. Sad that other ones doesm`t agreee with me. But, no worries. Someone will just die. That`s all.Cat the Colourful(Feed me!)Zzz04:37, 26May, 2011(UTC)
Against. Funnybony 15:20, May 24 15:20, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
Do you have any suggestions on how I can make it better, and maybe even flip your vote? Thanks. -- 15:36, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
Ehhhhhh.... the text kind of implies that gay people = retarded people. This tone doesn't exactly work to the article's benefit. TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 05:49, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
Oh dear, I wasn't trying to imply that at all. I feel like people don't really get the joke of why I wrote it this way. A derogatory term for a gay person it a fruit, therefore I wrote it form the perspective of two... well... fruits. -- 15:45, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix this? Please try to be specific. Thanks. -- 01:16, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
Against. I did not like the way the article looked. Really, the words could have been the US Declaration of Independence, and I would vote the same way. Is it a list? Is it a bad power point presentation? either one, obviously such would at least engage me. As an "article" it doesn't --KevilLipsMUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:43, May 26, 2011 (UTC) --KevilLipsMUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:43, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
But how do I fix it? No one will give me any information. -- 01:49, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
Okay, so I changed the format. What do you think? -- 02:29, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
Against. Per TKF, sorry mate. ChiefjusticeDS 09:53, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
Oh look dear! We're on VFH!
Well look at that, we are!
Comment. No way to make this better other than reverting to the subject. This isn't an article about fruit. Funnybony 15:39, May 24 15:39, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
Comment. "Our readers are hear to read about fruits, not about fruits." Removing this line would be a good start. It'sMrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 04:01, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Bro! I didn't check to see who was the writer. But its you, dude! You're a great writer. You asked by opinion and that is that "Fruit" is a real subject, like in Wikipedia, a real subject, and this article doesn't do any justice to the real subject. Therefore it seems not right of you to hog the entire subject with one gay joke. Could THIS be THE Unycyclopedia article on the subject of fruit? No, of course not. But your gay joke is also valid, so may I suggest a simple way to fix it? Please? Okay, why not simply rename it "Fruits", perhaps rearrange the first picture and show an apple or something more subtle than balls as the starter picture, maybe an apple with a bite out. Please add a few more gay-fruits jokes to make it longer and have more fun. Then reNom as "FRUITS", with more subtle pics and more jokes. That way you are not wrongly usurping the entire subject of Fruit, which is, ah, about fruit - you know! Also keep it more subtle, like don't show two gay dudes together, better show two fruits together. That's just my suggestion and I hope it helps. I really do care. Cheers!--Funnybony 05:11, May 26