NF Consider it "Mr winkler is GAY: A Retrospective." Or just let it stand on its own. Either way, it deserves a feature.-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 01:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
For. Mr winkler is GAY is a funny article, so the retrospective is relevant. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
For. I'm not much of one for fad vanityshite like Fisher Price, but the retrospective on this is just too good. ЖKalir, WanderingHippieSalesman 00:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
FEATURE! --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Sure - But I'm not taking the blame if the real Mr. Winkler finds this article. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:37, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
For the satire. Satire is, after all, making fun of stupid things, and keeping it up for as long as the stupid things are there. That's why we have two featured articles about GeorgeBush, and plenty about intelligent design. Vandalism is incredibly stupid, and I can think of no more Uncyclopedic way to mock it than this. We should keep it up for as long as necessary or until it stops being funny, which this is, and that's always good. — SirWehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
For Although this is considerably different than Fisher Price: A Retrospective. With that article, even though it was based off of the "IP nonsense is literary genius" concept, you really didn't have need Fisher Price per se to make it funny. (It would be a pretty random concept though.) With this page, however, you really need to read the original to get the joke. That's why I strongly purpose the content of Mr winkler is GAY to be placed in "Today's Featured Article" box. Just like this. : ) --Kip > Talk•Works•• 17:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment- I agree with Kip on this one. I think that'd be a good idea. Even though he can't spell propose. --AndorinKato 19:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
For incredibly funny--AE 00:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
No The actual vandalism is funnier. Sorry - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 02:07, Nov 24
God no, why are we allowing this? Note to self: invent new Euroipods/Fisher price-esque vandalism and pass it off as an in-joke. ~MinitrueSirSysRq!Talk!Sex!=/GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF 17:51, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Abstain Too stressed. I want to wait until the other Mr winkler vote fails, and then I'll decide. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 02:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I confess of contemplating the nomination of yet another spinoff but I'm afraid that Kip will shoot me dead. Or do something worse. ~ 09:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I won't do that. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 17:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC) ...or will I?
Okay, admittedly I was apprehensive in reading this piece due to the ridiculous nature of its source material. However, I have read it, and it is really quite funny. So, my conditional for is that you change the lead image. Because Henry Winkler is not Francis Winkler. He's the Fonz. And the coolest Jew ever. --THINKER 05:32, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Well, sure, I can do that. --AndorinKato 05:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I actually liked the old image. The look of that image with that article (and I don't care who it really is) is quite funny to me. --AAA! (AAAA) 07:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Featured. Got some feature. TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 4 December 2007. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.