Uncyclopedia:VFH/Fox News

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Fox News (history, logs)

Article: Fox News

Score: 13 unbiased users

Nominated by: Snowflake mini Mattsnow 04:05, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
For: 13
  1. I'm jealous Shabidoo jumped on that vacant article before me, but he made a gem out of it! Snowflake mini Mattsnow 04:05, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
  2. For. I read this yesterday and was tempted to nom it. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 05:39, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Extensive edits and tweakings were made yesterday thanks to Magic man and Mattsnow. --ShabiDOO 11:53, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
  4. For-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:46, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol for vote For. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:16, 17 November 2011
  6. For. Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:58, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol for vote Damn you, Mattsnow! I went to nom this and saw someone already had! Great article, though. --Tophat headless 02:01, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
  8. The improvements I wanted were made. --HM (T) 03:34, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol for vote For. I support this message. --Writey 00:20, November 19, 2011 (UTC)
  10. For. 19:37, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
  11. For. Certainly not the most original article there could be, but well-written and funny nonetheless. This is one of those titles that I'm sure people expect us to have a good satirical article on, so I'm pleased that it's been revamped. -RAHB 04:37, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
  12. For.--DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  10:51, November 21, 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol for vote For. I understand and I wish to continue. HauntedUndies2. 09:17, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
  14. For. ChiefjusticeXBox 22:13, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 0
  1. Weak against. The angle gets grating after a while. Yes, I get it, Fox is perfect and impartial. It was like reading the same line over and over. It got better near the end, but this is just below par still, imo. (I'm not making any sense, am I?) --HM (T) 21:30, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
    Thanks for the constructive criticism. If only there was a lot more of it on VFH. I've made quite a few cuts and took it easy on the repetition of the adjectives. It is wihtout a doubt a better article now because of your detailed critique. You should do pee reviews. --ShabiDOO 23:46, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
    I do. lol --HM (T) 03:34, November 18, 2011 (UTC)

#Against. 19:27, November 18, 2011 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools