Uncyclopedia:VFH/Filial Piety Goes to Camp

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Filial Piety (history, logs)

Article: Filial Piety

Score: -3 articles with an ambiance of "vague Princess Bride-ism"

Nominated by: Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 09:37, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
For: 4
  1. 2010 will be the year, I swear! --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 09:37, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
  2. For. And don't talk back. Style Oranssiviiva Guide 13:26, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
  3. For.Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! CUN Icons-flag-us NOTM 17:05, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
  4. For MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 08:33, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 7
  1. No it won't!Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 12:52, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Symbol against vote Against. I don't think so. There's some funny parts to this, but overall I wasn't amused. To be fair, sexual abuse has never been funny to me. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 13:18 EST 30 Mar, 2010
  3. Back in the box you go I read it again, to see if anything had changed. Nope. Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 20:36, Mar 30 2010
  4. uh *pbbt* --Roman Dog Bird 21:08, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Against. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:29, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Against. Nothing ever changes, nothing ever changes, nooothing eveeeer changeeeeees but the shooooes! --UU - natter UU Manhole 08:31, Mar 31
  7. Against. ChiefjusticePS3 10:49, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
  • Three pees on talk. Or two. I don't remember. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 09:37, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
  • I question the value of those pee reviews. all three are three years old, and were done by the same two guys within a span of about 2 1/2 hours. I would suggest submitting it to pee review sometime in the future for a true in-depth look at it. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 19:31 EST 30 Mar, 2010
  • I question the value of that judgment based on your cursory observations and your neglect to realize the somewhat-easy-to-inference-fact that the first two were criticisms on a work in progress. And they are three years old because this article is three years old. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:32, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools
projects