This is funny to me And whoa is me for having THE GALL to dare vote for something so pitiful, so stupid, so spectacularly dumbfoundingly dumb. I must have no sense of comedy whatsoever. HOW DARE I vote for something that I find funny when there are so many other articles out there that OTHER people find funny. I might as well shoot myself in the face now because I'm such a dumb fucking asshole. Who would vote for this article when it is so fucking terrible?! A backwards monkey with a sideways baseball hat could write better satire than this. Whomever wrote this article is a dumb fuck, and I say to him: "You dumb fuck." In conclusion: Fuck off. WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 17:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Not until it's featured. Saberwolf116 15:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Spoiler. This article isn't even funny, and can barely be classified as satire, and is bad, and is overly obvious, and is totally inferior to several of my own articles. I will make my opinion on this matter known to every single person who votes for--even though a simple vote of against on my part would have more than sufficed--because I'm such a nice guy. —UnführerGuildyRittervonGuildensternenstein 15:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Against. Per Last time it was nommed, nothing's changed since then SirACROLOKUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 17:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Against. Per the annoying renoms. ~ 18:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Is voting against an article just because it was recently nominated even a valid reason? Come on people, vote on whether or not it was funny, not because of the annoying re-noms. Basically, just say "not funny" instead of "annoying renoms". That's all I ask. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 16:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Still not VFH worthy. If I add : ReNom bullying, fake vote ballot stuffing, whingeing , attempted steamrollering the opposition , bad precedent, a Trolls Charter...etc..--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 16:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. Failed. For the Nth time.~ This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 13:01, 22 July 2009 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.