N+F - VFH is running slow, so I'm going through the ol' quasi-featured archive. Articles written in the form of a story from grandpa always amuse me. Though we've already featured at least two, so, like grandpa, it might be starting to get old and worn out. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 11:52, Apr. 17, 2010
For I read this one just recently, either from a random page spin or from the quasi list, and liked it. Grandpa always has another story to tell, that's why it's sometimes best to set him down on the porch with his paper and sneak back into the house. Aleister in Chains 11:59 17 4 MMX
I was a fence sitter on this one, swinging wildly back and forth between for and against. I like it but I'm not sure about it at the same time. Finally, seeing the fuss that we've all made over it, I am voting simply because I think if we're going to have this much debate as seasoned Uncyclopedians, how are the general public going to react? SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009Saturday, 01:34, May 15 2010 UTC
Against. Again and again and again and there's something right with the world today, and everybody knows it's wrong, but we can tell 'em no or we could let it go, but I would rather be a-hangin' on... Anyway, as per the last 40 times. --UU - natter16:05, Apr 18 The game got changed. --UU - natter20:29, Apr 29
Against. Remains stained by the attempt by others to railroad this to featuredom before. It's also not funny either just very very creepy! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:36, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Don't care about whether it's first-person. Just didn't like it.--SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK) 19:28, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
Against vote in order to cancel out UU's vote, which was, in fact, the worst vote ever cast in the entire history of Uncyclopedia. pillow talk 21:36, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
I knew if I really tried, one day something I did would stand out! --UU - natter08:06, May 7
Against. Poor Under_User. He's really been driven insane by these injokes. --Matfen 16:55, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
Against. - I like many of the authors articles, especially Selective Inbreeding which is an inspiration for people, like mysefl, who find their own relatives sexy. This one just does not land for me.--Sycamore(Talk) 09:53, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Question. Can anyone voting against tell me what their original reason was to vote against this? That way I don't have to skim through all the nominations. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM16:14, 18 April 2010
Can't speak for anyone else, but my incredibly complicated reason is that I don't find it funny. And I do read the darn thing every time in case I change my mind. But I still don't. Subjectivity and all that. Ah well. --UU - natter16:21, Apr 18
I hate articles written in the first person or that have some kind of non-encyclopedic theme going on. for example: this shit. --Roman Dog Bird 17:29, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
This is actually the most encyclopedic article I've ever written. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:43, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
True, but it's still in first person perspective. I can see how it works, but it still bugs me man, ya dig? --Roman Dog Bird 19:42, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
Comment on Happytimes' vote: links are what make this a wiki and not a disconnected bunch of random pages. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 02:51, April 24, 2010 (UTC)</center>
True, but when you link the word, "the," or the word, "or," or the word, "word," what's the point? None of those has anything to do with the sentiment of my thoughts. Links should cause interest. Often times I find as much enjoyment seeing the selected links of an article as the article itself -- this one had a few, but failed throughout and I stopped reading them at some point.
Fix vote count please. Does someone know the way to keep the vote count going while skipping a striked vote? Right now the votes against are one less than it looks. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 03:09, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
Well, I know there's way to fix it as I've seen it done here. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 03:17, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
Pah! You and your high-falootin' "fixes". Back in the 'Nam all we got was AK47 and a bag of rice, and they gave us an IOU on the rice. Did we complain? No! We were too busy winning the war. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 03:58, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
Oh. Well, if you served in Vietnam obviously that makes you more qualified on Uncyclopedia. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 04:19, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
Mod's last comment, lol. Al des chain 4:25 7 5 MMX
Featured. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 03:30, May 15, 2010 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 16 May 2010. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
N+F - VFH is running slow, so I'm going through the ol' 
I know how to respect my elders. 
Against. per my vote last time. word for word. -- 
Question. Can anyone voting against tell me what their original reason was to vote against this? That way I don't have to skim through all the nominations. 
