For, because saying "it failed last time" is a damned weak reason. Also, I wrote it. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
For And I also propose that EugeneKay's vote be stricken until he comes up with a better reason to vote against.--PhlegmLeoispotter* (garble! jank!) 16:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
No, because it didn't pass last time. Or the time before that. EugeneKaywuzhere(whinethank)05:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Also no...still. The vague Princess Brideism just isn't enough for me. Hey, I said "deism". Cool. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes. Wait, I mean No. I've not been one for "your grandpa, by virtue of being old, is willing to ignore incest and pedophilia laws to rape you" and that's what I see here. ЖKaliryes, I play Pokémon 23:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
NO (again again). if your article only has one joke you'd be best to make sure it's a funny one - jack mort |cunt| talk - 13:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm low health exceptional case (17%)TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 17:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.