For. All I know is that I haven't laughed this hard at anything I've made in a long time. I actually can't believe I put this together.-- 12:46, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
For are Romartus and Necropaxx fucking kidding (and why do I have to think that all the time) —talk 12:49, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
For. We've featured all-image articles before (admittedly in at least one case because Zombiebaron whored it like the shameless undead slut he is), but nonetheless, that shouldn't stop this being featured. The only question in my mind was over originality, but the good Doc's rant below has pretty well assuaged that. This is funny - feature it. --UU - natter17:31, Jan 9
For. ~ 18:08, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
For. A stunning amount of hard work has produced another glorious gem from the Doc. Hard to believe there's an against vote on this one when you consider the effort he has made. It's time to abandon our feeble ideas of what a featured article has to be and start TORTURING! I mean, voting for this. IronLung 21:55, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
For I guess... --Matfen 23:40, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
For. Changed as a result of rechecking article,history,comments here and message from the author. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:43, January 10, 2010 (UTC)
That is simply amazing --Nikau 03:34, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
For. Our path is paved...with victory! SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:32, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
For. Satirises both an important real world issue and Marvel comics quite nicely. --Hugs and kisses,Black_Flamingo 19:19, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
For. Really really funny and sharp as lemon knife. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:56, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 0
Against. I am not sure if this qualifies for this section - perhaps image of the day?. Also I will have to question the origins of this article. Was it created for uncylopedia or has it come from elsewhere (which would be an invalid nomination)? RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:40, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
Careful with the plagiarism allegations mate, you're liable to offend somebody. I know you don't mean it that way, but that's a pretty serious accusation to throw around. -OptyCSucks! CUN21:59, 9 Jan
I'm guessing Romartus isn't familiar with the Doc's past work. Looking at articles like Economic Collapse Barbie™ and Gay Jesus, it is clear that he is perfectly capable of producing such a piece. IronLung 22:04, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain.. Well, I liked it, but I don't think this will work as a feature. For one thing, it's all pictures (and huge ones at that). For another thing, I don't really this this qualifies as an Uncyclopedia article. We are a pseudo-encyclopedia, not a webcomic. Featuring a webcomic on an on-line encyclopedia just doesn't feel right to me. •••Necropaxx(T){~}Saturday, 03:11, Jan 9 2010
Comment. This project was scanned out of Marvel Comic Anthology and tediously pieced together by me personally. Roughly two issues concerning the "Origin of red Skull" were used. It's classic 1940's Stan Lee. As far as "pic of the day", this would be just another effort shot down by "text based humor". All that matters is.....is it hysterically funny or what? All other technicalities are moot. This is a properly written story, parodying a Marvel Comic and featuring the "war on terror" and whether it's delivered in text or image is irrelevant.-- 12:16, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comet I think it's just that some of us have to wrap our minds around it, even I (Stan Lee in real life) had to quiz you on the process and the concept before understanding what you did. Five days with no sleep and a good waterboarding or 187 should take that defensive attitude out of you. Aleister in Chains December 7, 1941
Tutorial: I made up a quick tutorial, with sample scan, to show how this was created here-- 18:07, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
Featured. ~ 23:28, January 11, 2010 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 12 January 2010. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Nom and For If I saw this and didn't nominate it I'd be going against my constitutional oath as an Uncyclopedian. 
FUCK YES Great job, and yes it will work as a feature. Nicely done really. 
Abstain.. Well, I liked it, but I don't think this will work as a feature. For one thing, it's all pictures (and huge ones at that). For another thing, I don't really this this qualifies as an Uncyclopedia article. We are a pseudo-encyclopedia, not a webcomic. Featuring a webcomic on an on-line encyclopedia just doesn't feel right to me. 
23:28, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
