Uncyclopedia:VFH/Easter Bunny

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Easter Bunny (history, logs)

Article: Easter Bunny

Score: 15 holiday courses

Nominated by: Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
For: 15
  1. Nom and For, now that the PLS is over and VFHing is, like, legal and shit. Another masterpiece from Thinker. -- Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. Aye -RAHB 04:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  3. sDig thanks TKF! And while I agree with Kip, well.. thats like, far away man.. :) --THINKER 04:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  4. For Anyway to schedule it for feature on Easter next year?     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      14:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  5. For. I always wondered how Easter came about. Now I...still don't know. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  6. For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  7. For --THE 23:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  8. For Me likey.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  9. For --General Insineratehymn 21:45, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  10. For Since apparently my opinion otherwise isn't worth eggs. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  11. For. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 16:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  12. For I love it! --ForestAngel Receive Blessings! Forestangel1 06:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  13. For, Only on the grounds that I think it would be good for Easter. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  14. For. Reskin, anyone. Delicious article! goshzillacorrespondence 13:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
  15. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Against: 0
  1. Weak Against Only on the grounds that I think it would be good for Easter. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
    Comment That's an awful reason. We can always put it in reskin next Easter. By "we" I mean "excluding me". Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC
    Apparently you have to vote on the merits of the article only. Who knew. Spang talk 12:34, 25 Jul 2007
Comments
  • like the article below, perhaps Kip's vote could be changed to an abstain due to it not relating to the merits of the actual article? I don't mind the against if there is more to it that the time frame. --THINKER 20:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Re Spang: Not only, but the merit of the piece should probably play some role in one's vote for said piece. As you can see below, Ekashp included a valid reason in addition to his original against, and as such, his vote remains. --THINKER 00:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools
projects