From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

EU (history, logs)

Article: EU

Score: 2

Nominated by: Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 19:28, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
For: 2
  1. Symbol for vote Self-Nom and For Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 19:28, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol for vote For. Impressive work, well written and full of knowledge of the subject. If I can't vote for this I can't vote for anything. Aleister 1:02 25-4-'13
Against: 0

No against votes

  • Comment. There are many missed opportunities here imho. i did laugh a couple times, I found most of the jokes are cliches that fall flat. instead of randomly narrating the antics of each country...the article could have an over all concept or clear purpose. if it must be a random article about psychopathic nations, then I think the atticle would benifit by sticking a few nations and taking the character of each country to higher level of comedic absurdity. At the very least I would argue that at least some of the ideas should last more than a paragraph. ShabiDOO 07:18, April 26, 2013 (UTC)
  • My take is similar. Section 1, on how each of the major nations cynically uses the EU to advance national goals, I regard as mostly true and about as funny as the 15 minutes of negotiations between moves in the game of Diplomacy. It's told jauntily, but some serious anti-federalists also tell things jauntily. Geopolitics and a joint stance vis-a-vis America are similar serious points. I don't claim that the author is advocating anything in particular, but it reads like advocacy. Spıke Ѧ 21:59 29-Apr-13


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools